Evolutionary Philosophy
  • Home
  • Worldview
    • Epistemology
    • Metaphysics
    • Logic
    • Ethics
    • Politics
    • Aesthetics
  • Applied
    • Know Thyself
    • 10 Tenets
    • Survival of the Fittest Philosophers >
      • Ancient Philosophy (Pre 450 CE)
      • Medieval Philosophy (450-1600 CE)
      • Modern Philosophy (1600-1920 CE)
      • Contemporary Philosophy (Post 1920 CE)
    • 100 Thought Experiments
    • Elsewhere
  • Fiction
    • Draining the Swamp >
      • Further Q&A
    • Short Stories
    • The Vitanauts
  • Blog
  • Store
  • About
    • Purpose
    • My Evolution
    • Evolution 101
    • Philosophy 101

Thought Experiment 74: Water, Water, Everywhere

12/5/2016

2 Comments

 
Picture
Last week, evolution was the "universal solvent." But now, can it solve a problem about another universal solvent?
Here's another thought experiment that seems trivial upon first read, but look at it carefully. I'll explain just a bit more afterwards so we can give it its proper consideration during the week ahead.

---------------------------------------------------
     NASA had dubbed it "Twin Earth." The newly discovered planet was not just roughly the same size as ours, it had a similar climate and life had evolved there almost identically. In fact, there were even countries where people spoke dialects of English.
     Twin Earth contained cats, frying pans, burritos, televisions, baseball, beer, and—at least it seemed—water. It certainly had a clear liquid which fell from the sky, filled rivers and oceans, and quenched the thirsts of the indigenous humanoids and the astronauts from Earth.
     When the liquid was analysed, though, it turned out not to be H2O but a very complex substance dubbed H2No. NASA therefore announced that its previous claim that water had been found on Twin Earth was wrong. Some people say that if it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it is a duck. In this case, the billed bird waddled and quacked, but it wasn't a duck after all.
     The tabloid newspaper headlines, however, offered a different interpretation: "It's water, Jim, but not as we know it."

Source: "The meaning of 'meaning'" by Hilary Putnam, republished in Philosophical Papers, Vol. 2: Mind, Language and Reality, 1975.

Baggini, J., The Pig That Wants to Be Eaten, 2005, p. 220.
---------------------------------------------------

Okay. I like the ending joke from Star Trekkin', but I think we need some further explanation. Here's how Baggini described the problem that's actually being raised:

Is H2No water or not? More to the point, why should we care? Problems like these strike many as examples of philosophers' unhealthy preoccupation with matters of mere semantics. ... Imagine Earth and Twin Earth 1,000 years ago. No one then knew what the chemical composition of water was. Thus, if you consider what would have gone on in the mind of someone thinking "that is a glass of water," it would have been the same in the case of both the earthling and the twin earthling. But...if it is H2No, the twin earthling would be having a true thought, but the earthling would be having a false one, since it isn't what we call water at all. But that means they can't be having the same thought, since the same thought cannot be both true and false. If this line of reasoning is correct...we are left with a surprising upshot. Since what is going on in the head of the earthling and twin earthling is exactly the same, but their thoughts are different, that means thoughts are not entirely in the head! At least part of a thought—that which supplies the meaning of the words—is actually out there in the world. So the question of whether H2No is water is not simply one of mere semantics. How you answer it determines whether meaning and thoughts are, as we usually assume, carried around in our heads, or outside of our heads, in the world. It can literally drive your thinking out of your mind.

Got it? Then what's your solution to this now? I'll be back on Friday with mine.
2 Comments
Predrag Selimanovic
12/5/2016 11:29:34 am

I don't see the problem. It wasn't what we call water (H20). Even earthlings 2 will agree since some experiments showcase the difference between two liquids. They call their liquid water? Fine, still not the same thing.

Reply
@EdGibney link
12/5/2016 12:17:19 pm

I agree, but I think this will just be a useful way to discuss theories of meaning so we're clear about what knowledge really consists of. If meaning is "partially outside of your head," as Baggini said, then does that have implications for transhumanists who think they can upload their consciousness into a computer? Not necessarily, but this experiment raises questions about that.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Subscribe to Help Shape This Evolution

    SUBSCRIBE

    RSS Feed


    Blog Philosophy

    This is where ideas mate to form new and better ones. Please share yours respectfully...or they will suffer the fate of extinction!


    Archives

    July 2022
    June 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    August 2021
    June 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    May 2019
    March 2019
    December 2018
    July 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    April 2012


    Click to set custom HTML
Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.