Mmmm. Poppadoms.
The title of this week's thought experiment made me hungry. But then I read the experiment and got angry. Now I'm hangry!
---------------------------------------------------
As life-transforming events go, the arrival of poppadoms at the table hardly counts as the most dramatic. But it gave Saskia the kind of mental jolt that would profoundly alter the way she thought.
The problem was that the waiter who delivered the poppadoms was not of Indian descent, but was a white Anglo-Saxon. This bothered Saskia because, for her, one of the pleasures of going out for a curry was the feeling that you were tasting a foreign culture. Had the waiter served her a steak and kidney pie it would have been no more incongruous than his skin colour.
The more she thought about it, however, the less sense it made. Saskia thought of herself as a multiculturalist. That is to say, she positively enjoyed the variety of cultures an ethnically diverse society sustains. But her enjoyment depended upon other people remaining ethnically distinct. She could enjoy a life flitting between many different cultures only if others remained firmly rooted in one. For her to be a multiculturalist, others needed to be monoculturalists. Where did that leave her ideal of a multicultural society?
Baggini, J., The Pig That Wants to Be Eaten, 2005, p. 199.
---------------------------------------------------
Baggini's subtle attack on multiculturalism seems to rest on a false point. What do you think it is? Or do you agree with him that multiculturalism is a doomed paradox? I'll be back on Friday to share an answer from my point of view.
---------------------------------------------------
As life-transforming events go, the arrival of poppadoms at the table hardly counts as the most dramatic. But it gave Saskia the kind of mental jolt that would profoundly alter the way she thought.
The problem was that the waiter who delivered the poppadoms was not of Indian descent, but was a white Anglo-Saxon. This bothered Saskia because, for her, one of the pleasures of going out for a curry was the feeling that you were tasting a foreign culture. Had the waiter served her a steak and kidney pie it would have been no more incongruous than his skin colour.
The more she thought about it, however, the less sense it made. Saskia thought of herself as a multiculturalist. That is to say, she positively enjoyed the variety of cultures an ethnically diverse society sustains. But her enjoyment depended upon other people remaining ethnically distinct. She could enjoy a life flitting between many different cultures only if others remained firmly rooted in one. For her to be a multiculturalist, others needed to be monoculturalists. Where did that leave her ideal of a multicultural society?
Baggini, J., The Pig That Wants to Be Eaten, 2005, p. 199.
---------------------------------------------------
Baggini's subtle attack on multiculturalism seems to rest on a false point. What do you think it is? Or do you agree with him that multiculturalism is a doomed paradox? I'll be back on Friday to share an answer from my point of view.
RSS Feed
