Evolutionary Philosophy
  • Home
  • About
    • Purpose
    • My Evolution
    • Press Kit
  • Philosophy
    • First Edition >
      • Tenets
      • Know Thyself
      • Survival of the Fittest Philosophers >
        • Ancient Philosophy (Pre 450 CE)
        • Medieval Philosophy (450-1600 CE)
        • Modern Philosophy (1600-1920 CE)
        • Contemporary Philosophy (Post 1920 CE)
      • Evolution 101
      • Philosophy 101
    • Later Works >
      • Academic Paper 1 >
        • Further FAQs
      • Academic Paper 2
      • Greatest Blog Hits
      • Other Publications
  • Fiction
    • Draining the Swamp >
      • Further Q&A
    • Short Stories
    • The Vitanauts
  • Blog
  • Shop

Thought Experiment 100: The Nest Café

7/17/2017

2 Comments

 
Picture
Who's he going to buy cheap food from?
Well, here we are—the final thought experiment! After deeply considering 99 entries from Julian Baggini's book that asked us what we are, what we know, what is good, and many other pointed inquiries from the philosophical canon, we may have begun to feel a little comfortable that we know how to go about conducting our lives. Like all good philosophers though, Baggini tries one last time to upend that comfort before we go our separate ways.

--------------------------------------------------
     Eric was a regular at the Nest café. The quality of the food and drink was unexceptional, but they were remarkably cheap.
     One day he asked the manager how she did it. She leaned over and whispered, conspiratorially, "Easy. You see, all my staff are from Africa. They need to survive but can't get regular jobs. So I let them sleep in the cellar, feed them just enough, and give them £5 cash a week. It's great—they work all day, six days a week. With my wage bill so low, I can offer low prices and make handsome profits.
     "Don't look so shocked," she continued, reading his reaction. "This suits everyone. They choose to work here because it helps them, I make money, and you get a bargain. Top up?"
     Eric accepted. But perhaps this would be his last coffee here. Despite the manager's justification, he felt, as a customer, he would be complicit in exploitation. As he sipped his americano, however, he wondered if the staff would appreciate his boycott. Weren't these jobs and the shelter of the cellar better than nothing?

Baggini, J., The Pig That Wants to Be Eaten, 2005, p. 298.
---------------------------------------------------

Lest you consider this too narrowly, here are some further thoughts about this experiment by Baggini:

You don't have to be a militant anti-capitalist to recognise that everyone who lives in a developed country is essentially in the same position as Eric. We import comparatively cheap goods because those producing them work for a pittance. And if we know this yet carry on buying, we are helping to maintain the situation. Do not be fooled by the superficial differences. Eric is closer to the cheap labour than we are, but geographical proximity is not ethically significant in this case. You don't cease to exploit someone simply by putting miles between you. Nor is the illegality of the café staff the issue. Simply imagine a country where such employment practices are permitted. ... If Eric is wrong to help feather the Nest, we are wrong to buy from businesses that treat the people at the other end of their supply chains in the same way. This is a very troubling conclusion, for it makes almost every one of us complicit in exploitation.

Ouch. What do you think? Are we global capitalists living in another era that future civilisations will look back on in horror? If not, why? If so, what should you do about it? I'll be back on Friday with my own comments on this final problem.
2 Comments
Disagreeable Me
7/17/2017 11:23:05 am

It's a tricky one, again.

On the one hand, I think it's not realistic to expect workers in developing countries to be paid a salary equivalent to what a worker in the west would get -- otherwise the jobs simply wouldn't be outsourced there and they would have no work at all.

But on the other hand, there's no need for them to be paid as little as possible either. If people were unwilling or unable to buy goods manufactured by people who could barely afford to survive, then there would be an incentive to pay a little extra, and so a boycott of manufacturers who pay too little would make sense.

I think it's too hard for individual consumers to research and monitor the provenance of goods they buy, so I think the right thing to do may be to elect officials who will instate bodies to apply regulatory solutions, e.g. perhaps levying punitive import duty on goods originating in exploitative factories. As long as there are still plenty of people ignoring the boycott then I don't see that the boycott does any good -- it may even do harm by reducing the amount of work available in developing countries.

So I'm not sure what the best solution is, but relying on the choices of individual consumers seems to me to be completely impractical.

I feel the same way about animal welfare in the meat and dairy industries. I would vote to support legislation to promote animal welfare before I would spend time researching where I bought my meat. And any such legislation would have to impose tarrifs on imports from countries without similar legislation.

Reply
Chuck Schneider
7/21/2017 03:54:09 pm

" Like the guy on our local TV news every night, " Don,t waste your money". Of course, every ethical humanist / EvolPhil person has some obligation to resist human exploitation.
If you really like the restaurant, just leave very large tips to the exploited staff. If that doesn't solve your conscience, be sure to inform the owner / managers why you will stop going there.
One of the proper things we expect form our modern governments are rules that prohibit exploitation. Minimum wages, safe working environments, child labor laws, quality products, etc. these "Restrictions" on free markets tend to raise all boats. Without these restrictions, good ethical merchants are forced into the lowest common denominator. When governments do not do their jobs, we end up with unions, and if unions are restricted, eventual violence.
Tie in in to Evolve Phil ? Society should be structured so that the largest number of people have the opportunity to develop their talents. Somewhat akin to Rohr,s philosophy.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Stay in Touch

    SUBSCRIBE

    RSS Feed


    Blog Philosophy

    This is where ideas mate to form new and better ones. Please share yours respectfully...or they will suffer the fate of extinction!


    Archives

    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    May 2019
    March 2019
    December 2018
    July 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    April 2012


    Some Blogs I Follow

    The Book Designer
    The Brooks Blog
    The Creative Penn
    Edge.org
    Evolving Thoughts
    Evolution This View of Life
    Gone Public
    Sam Harris
    Michele Gibney
    Jonathan Martin - 21k12
    Morality's Random Walk
    Ockham's Beard
    Philosophy Bites
    Rationally Speaking
    Reason and Meaning
    Rogue Neuron
    Talking Philosophy
    Rob Wray

    Blog Directory & Business Pages at OnToplist.com

    Blogarama - The Blog Directory
    blog directoryagence web
    Submit Blog & RSS Feeds
    Blogs lists and reviews
    My Zimbio
    Submit Blog Directory
    The SEO King
    Blog Directory
    DirectoryBlogs
    Click to set custom HTML
    Picture

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.